News

Newsletter

12 de February de 2015

Newsletter 2015.03 – Brazilian Antitrust Authority expected to decide cases of “sham litigation” involving patents in 2015

It is expected that, in 2015, the administrative court of the Brazilian antitrust authority (Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica – CADE) rules some important cases involving the sham litigation doctrine applied to intellectual property. It is expected that these cases will more accurately indicate what CADE understands as anticompetitive behavior and infringement of the economic system concerning the abuse of intellectual property rights.
 
CADE’s administrative court is a federal nonjudicial instance encharged with enforcing the constitutional economic principles, such as free enterprise, freedom of competition, social role of property, consumer protection and the restraining of abusive behavior. Among its institutional competences it can be mentioned the legally required prior consent to “acts of economical concentration”, such as mergers and acquisitions, and the application of sanctions to infringements of the economic order.
 
It is always worth remembering that the current Brazilian antitrust Act, differently from its predecessor, expressly considers the possibility of undue use of intellectual property rights as a hypothesis of infringement of the economic system. The administrative court forthcoming decisions this year will help to clarify what CADE understands as an abusive use of intellectual property rights.
 
The American doctrine of sham litigation, which forbids the abusive use of the judicial system as a way to constrain competitors by the lawsuit itself, regardless of the merits’ pertinence or chances of success, has already been applied by CADE in past decisions. The novelty this time falls within its application to intellectual property related cases.
Back

Last related news

6 de May de 2025

Legal Protection for Developers: Compensation for Irregular Licenses

Our firm recently secured another important court victory on behalf of a software developer client in a lawsuit against a company that Legal Protection for Developers: Compensation for Irregular Licenses

  • Kasznar Leonardos
  • Ler notícia

    24 de April de 2025

    Third Parties and Software Piracy: Companies Remain Legally Responsible

    During software compliance audits, it is not uncommon for companies to claim that pirated programs were installed by external contractors or IT Third Parties and Software Piracy: Companies Remain Legally Responsible

  • Kasznar Leonardos
  • Ler notícia

    16 de April de 2025

    Medicinal Cannabis Review: Public Consultation 1.316/2025 open

    The Public Consultation (CP) No. 1.316/2025, which aims to initiate the review process of Collegiate Board Resolution (RDC) No. 327/2019 from the Medicinal Cannabis Review: Public Consultation 1.316/2025 open

    Ler notícia
    13959
    plugins premium WordPress