13 de November de 2020

The controversy regarding amendments to patent applications in Brazil – A new chapter begins

As reported in our Newsletter #06, sent in March 2019, the Public Civil Action filed in 2002 by the Federal Public Prosecution Office (PPO) generated heated debates around the interpretation of section 32 of the Industrial Property Act (IPA – Law #9,279/1996) concerning the examination of patent applications.

In summary, the PPO argued that voluntary changes to the scope of the claims of a patent application, by (restrict) interpretation of section 32 of the IPA, could only be submitted until the examination request. Even so, this amendment request should be limited to the matter initially revealed in the application.

For further information, click below to access our full newsletter.

See file

Back

Last related news

1 de July de 2026

INPI Ordinance No. 80/2026 and Second Medical Use Patents

INPI Ordinance No. 80/2026, published on June 30, 2026, in the Official Gazette No. 2895, revised Chapter 9 of the Guidelines for Examination … INPI Ordinance No. 80/2026 and Second Medical Use Patents

1 de July de 2026

Joint Judiciary Ordinance Creates Permanent Industrial Property Committee and Strengthens Cooperation Between State and Federal Courts

Joint FOJURJ Ordinance No. 4/2026 was recently published, creating the Permanent Industrial Property Committee within the Judiciary Forum of the State of … Joint Judiciary Ordinance Creates Permanent Industrial Property Committee and Strengthens Cooperation Between State and Federal Courts

30 de June de 2026

New Cycle for Fast-track Examination Requests, Including PPH, Opens in Brazil for Telecommunication Cases

By means of Ordinance 05/2026, published on June 30, 2026, the BPTO has announced that a new cycle for fast-track examination routes, … New Cycle for Fast-track Examination Requests, Including PPH, Opens in Brazil for Telecommunication Cases