13 de November de 2020

The controversy regarding amendments to patent applications in Brazil – A new chapter begins

As reported in our Newsletter #06, sent in March 2019, the Public Civil Action filed in 2002 by the Federal Public Prosecution Office (PPO) generated heated debates around the interpretation of section 32 of the Industrial Property Act (IPA – Law #9,279/1996) concerning the examination of patent applications.

In summary, the PPO argued that voluntary changes to the scope of the claims of a patent application, by (restrict) interpretation of section 32 of the IPA, could only be submitted until the examination request. Even so, this amendment request should be limited to the matter initially revealed in the application.

For further information, click below to access our full newsletter.

See file

Back

Last related news

1 de July de 2025

New PPH Cycle Opens for Third Quarter of 2025 – Telecommunication Applications Excluded

In accordance with Ordinance 03/2025, published by the BPTO on March 25, 2025, a new limit of 800 Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) … New PPH Cycle Opens for Third Quarter of 2025 – Telecommunication Applications Excluded

1 de July de 2025

Brazil’s Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down Internet Law Provision, Imposes Stricter Duty of Care on Online Platforms

On Thursday, June 26, the Brazilian Supreme Federal Court (STF) issued a landmark ruling, partially invalidating Article 19 of the Brazilian Internet … Brazil’s Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down Internet Law Provision, Imposes Stricter Duty of Care on Online Platforms

24 de June de 2025

Software License Compliance: A Constitutional and Strategic Right

In Brazil, the holder of intellectual property rights is entitled not only to economically exploit their work, but also to monitor how … Software License Compliance: A Constitutional and Strategic Right

Kasznar Leonardos