13 de November de 2020

The controversy regarding amendments to patent applications in Brazil – A new chapter begins

As reported in our Newsletter #06, sent in March 2019, the Public Civil Action filed in 2002 by the Federal Public Prosecution Office (PPO) generated heated debates around the interpretation of section 32 of the Industrial Property Act (IPA – Law #9,279/1996) concerning the examination of patent applications.

In summary, the PPO argued that voluntary changes to the scope of the claims of a patent application, by (restrict) interpretation of section 32 of the IPA, could only be submitted until the examination request. Even so, this amendment request should be limited to the matter initially revealed in the application.

For further information, click below to access our full newsletter.

See file

Back

Last related news

15 de May de 2026

CONAR updates Influencers Guide in line with the new requirements for transparency and protection in the digital environment

The National Council for Advertising Self-Regulation (“CONAR”) released, last Monday (11), the new edition of the Guide to Marketing and Advertising by … CONAR updates Influencers Guide in line with the new requirements for transparency and protection in the digital environment

11 de May de 2026

Digital ECA: Signs of Practical Enforcement of the New Regulatory Framework

The Digital Statute of the Child and Adolescent (Law No. 15,211/2025 – “Digital ECA”) came into effect in March 2026 and is … Digital ECA: Signs of Practical Enforcement of the New Regulatory Framework

27 de March de 2026

New Structure of the ANPD and Impacts Brought by the Digital Child and Adolescent Statute

Among the most recent publications related to the Brazilian Data Protection Agency (“ANPD”), the release of Decree No. 12.881/2026 stands out. The Decree approves … New Structure of the ANPD and Impacts Brought by the Digital Child and Adolescent Statute

Kasznar Leonardos